2 - 8 players | |
average 52 minutes | |
|
|
Published in 2016 | |
View Global Stats | |
![]() |
View on boardgamegeek.com |
Nautical Fighting Deduction Real-time | |
Simultaneous Action Selection Grid Movement Partnerships Role Playing Secret Unit Deployment Simulation Line Drawing |
At the bottom of the ocean, no one will hear you scream! In Captain Sonar, you and your teammates control a state-of-the-art submarine and are trying to locate an enemy submarine in order to blow it out of the water before they can do the same to you. Every role is important, and the confrontation is merciless. Be organized and communicate because a captain is nothing without his crew: the Chief Mate, the Radio Operator, and the Engineer. All the members of a team sit on one side of the table, and they each take a particular role on the submarine, with the division of labor for these roles being dependent on the number of players in the game: One player might be the captain, who is responsible for moving the submarine and announcing some details of this movement; another player is manning the sonar in order to listen to the opposing captain's orders and try to decipher where that sub might be in the water; a third player might be working in the munitions room to prepare torpedoes, mines and other devices that will allow for combat. Captain Sonar can be played in two modes: turn-by-turn or simultaneous. In the latter set-up, all the members of a team take their actions simultaneously while trying to track what the opponents are doing, too. When a captain is ready to launch an attack, the action pauses for a moment to see whether a hit has been recorded — then play resumes with the target having snuck away while the attacker paused or with bits of metal now scattered across the ocean floor. Multiple maps are included with varying levels of difficulty.
Total Games Played: | 7 |
Average Players Per Game | 8 |
Badges | Name | NemePoints | Total Games | Avg. NemePoints | Wins / Losses | % Won |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tim Miller | 96 | 7 | 14.00 |
|
71 % | |
Paige Watson | 81 | 7 | 12.00 |
|
57 % | |
Jim Hansen | 57 | 4 | 14.00 |
|
75 % | |
John Kang | 57 | 4 | 14.00 |
|
75 % | |
Chris Domes | 51 | 7 | 7.00 |
|
28 % | |
Chris Halverson | 39 | 3 | 13.00 |
|
66 % | |
Dan Smith | 39 | 3 | 13.00 |
|
66 % | |
Taiyo S. | 39 | 3 | 13.00 |
|
66 % | |
Andy Szymas | 27 | 4 | 7.00 |
|
25 % | |
Dan Barrett | 27 | 4 | 7.00 |
|
25 % | |
Paul Bogen | 27 | 4 | 7.00 |
|
25 % | |
Doug Wacker | 24 | 3 | 8.00 |
|
33 % | |
Jason Adams | 24 | 3 | 8.00 |
|
33 % |
Date Played | Result | |
---|---|---|
8/29/2016 |
1st
Chris Halverson
18
1st
Dan Smith
18
1st
Taiyo S.
18
1st
Tim Miller
18
2nd
Chris Domes
3
2nd
Jason Adams
3
2nd
Paige Watson
3
2nd
Doug Wacker
3
|
|
8/29/2016 |
1st
Chris Halverson
18
1st
Dan Smith
18
1st
Taiyo S.
18
1st
Tim Miller
18
2nd
Chris Domes
3
2nd
Jason Adams
3
2nd
Paige Watson
3
2nd
Doug Wacker
3
|
|
8/29/2016 |
1st
Paige Watson
18
1st
Doug Wacker
18
1st
Jason Adams
18
1st
Chris Domes
18
2nd
Tim Miller
3
2nd
Taiyo S.
3
2nd
Chris Halverson
3
2nd
Dan Smith
3
|
|
8/22/2016 |
1st
Paige Watson
18
1st
John Kang
18
1st
Jim Hansen
18
1st
Tim Miller
18
2nd
Chris Domes
3
2nd
Paul Bogen
3
2nd
Dan Barrett
3
2nd
Andy Szymas
3
|
|
8/22/2016 |
1st
Paige Watson
18
1st
John Kang
18
1st
Jim Hansen
18
1st
Tim Miller
18
2nd
Chris Domes
3
2nd
Paul Bogen
3
2nd
Dan Barrett
3
2nd
Andy Szymas
3
|